What are the major drawbacks to using OpenOffice DB vs. Microsoft Access?

calendar_today Asked Oct 21, 2008
thumb_up 5 upvotes
history Updated April 14, 2026

Direct Answer

It's odd for me to say this, because I'm not a fan of Access at all. However, I think Access is actually the nicer product here, for a number of reasons: It's been around a lot…. This is a prose walkthrough, ranked #52nd of 67 by community upvote score, from 2008.


The Problem (Q-score 6, ranked #52nd of 67 in the Access VBA archive)

The scenario as originally posted in 2008

I know that Open Office Database uses a java database backend. Does anyone have any insight on how this compares to the Jet Database Engine?

Also is the query designer/reporting nearly as robust as MS Access?

Why community consensus is tight on this one

Across 67 Access VBA entries in the archive, the accepted answer here holds niche answer (below median) status — meaning voters are unusually aligned on the right fix.


The Verified Solution — niche answer (below median) (+5)

Verbal answer — walkthrough without a code block

Note: the verified answer is a prose walkthrough. If you need a runnable sample, check Access VBA entries ranked in the top 10 of the same archive.

It’s odd for me to say this, because I’m not a fan of Access at all. However, I think Access is actually the nicer product here, for a number of reasons:

  • It’s been around a lot longer (maturity)
  • The core db engine is included with windows.
  • There’s an easily distributable runtime if your users don’t already have Access and you need to distribute an application.
  • Over the years it’s had enough people try to use it for things it’s not designed to do (web sites, workgroups) that they’ve put enough work into performance and concurrency so the two more recent incarnations (2003, 2007) are actually very robust if you’re doing something it is designed to do (desktop crud app, talking to linked sql server tables, very small workgroup). (I guess this is really the same as the first point)

On the other hand, there’s nothing wrong with the OpenOffice DB, and it’s free.


When to Use It — vintage (14+ years old, pre-2013)

Ranked #52nd in its category — specialized fit

This pattern sits in the 84% tail relative to the top answer. Reach for it when your scenario closely matches the question title; otherwise browse the Access VBA archive for a higher-consensus alternative.

What changed between 2008 and 2026

The answer is 18 years old. The Access VBA object model has been stable across Office 2013, 2016, 2019, 2021, 365, and 2024/2026 LTSC, so the pattern still compiles. Changes that might affect you: 64-bit API declarations (use PtrSafe), blocked macros in downloaded files (Mark-of-the-Web), and the shift toward Office Scripts for web-first workflows.

help
Frequently Asked Questions

This is a below-median answer — when does it still fit?
expand_more

Answer score +5 vs the Access VBA archive median ~4; this entry is niche. The score plus 6 supporting upvotes on the question itself (+6) means the asker and 4 subsequent voters all validated the approach.

The answer has no code block — how do I turn it into a snippet?
expand_more

Use the walkthrough above as a checklist, then open a top-10 Access VBA archive entry for a concrete starting template you can adapt.

This answer is 18 years old. Is it still relevant in 2026?
expand_more

Published 2008, which is 18 year(s) before today’s Office 2026 build. The Access VBA object model has had no breaking changes in that window. Three things to re-test: (1) blocked macros on downloaded files (Mark-of-the-Web), (2) 64-bit API declarations (PtrSafe, LongPtr), (3) any shift toward Office Scripts for web scenarios.

Which Access VBA pattern ranks just above this one at #51?
expand_more

The pattern one rank above is “Passing arguments to Access Forms created with 'New'”. If your use case overlaps, compare both before committing.

Data source: Community-verified Q&A snapshot. Q-score 6, Answer-score 5, original post 2008, ranked #52nd of 67 in the Access VBA archive. Last regenerated April 14, 2026.